Sign in or 

- Target is to have 9 – 15 OH’s to review for each meeting.
- OH author presents the need hypothesis. The emphasis is on need indicators and evidence.
- Group discussion of the OH. Observations are recorded along with new ideas, questions and comments. c)Individual (private) scoring of the OH:
Scoring codes:2 - Advance to mini-auction
3 – Back for more work
4 - Table / Archive
5 – Merge with another OH/OS/OP
- For each OH, each person reveals their OH score
- Discuss differences and resolve to a single score
Categorization guidelines
- Is OH worthy of voting? Evidence supports it? – Give it a 2
- Does OH need more work? Unclear, not enough evidence? – Give it a 3
- Don’t believe the evidence? Skeptical? – Give it a 2 or a 4
- Too similar to another OH, OS or OP? – Give it a 5
|
laschmitt |
Latest page update: made by laschmitt
, Dec 23 2007, 8:35 AM EST
(about this update
About This Update
66 words added 41 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
decision process
opportunity
review
More Info: links to this page
|