Change: a) Target is to have 9 – 15 OH’s to review for each meeting. OH Presentation and Categorization (3-5 minutes per OH) a) OH author presents the need hypothesis. The emphasis is on need indicators and evidence. b) Group discussion of the OH.   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 374)

Change: b) Team members have 10 votes to allocate as they wish to see receive a Shallow Dive. Voting Guidelines a) Is OH worthy of voting? Evidence supports it? – Give it a 2 b) Dose OH need more work? Unclear, not enough evidence? – Give it a 3 c)   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 318)

Change: decide which Opportunity Hypotheses (OH’s) should receive Shallow Dives, resulting in an Opportunity Statement (OS). This process is based on indicators of need, not evaluators of solutions. The following diagram shows the structure of the meeting from the perspective of what happens to the OH's.The actions undertaken   View changes from previous version. (Word count: 91)

Change: Created by laschmitt Sep 7 2007, 4:41 PM EDT for: no reason given